Entanglement of Subjects: A View from Early Childhood Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Inspired by our studies of pedagogy and the role of pedagogista we looked to Michael Foucault and how power is enacted in education. Thinking alongside Foucault, and Gert Biesta’s interpretation of subjectivity we problematize the way education is concerned with socialization and normalization. In this paper we attempt to understand the entanglement of subjectivities in relation to the Other. We suggest it is critical for educators to recognize the subjectivity of the ‘Other’ (children, in our field) through attentive listening and engaging in the process of becoming together in order to live well and gain new knowledge. A continual practice of critical reflection in dialogue with others is necessary to support educators in disrupting practices that govern children to fit particular social norms. We inquire together about the ways we view children and how practices of power in education, influenced by normalizing standards, deny children a deeper emergence of themselves
Article Details
References
Biesta, G.J.J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Colorado, USA: Paradigm Publishers.
Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Theoretical Perspectives: Modernity and Postmodernity, Power and Ethics. In Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation (2nd ed., p. 28). London: Routledge.
Davies, B. (2014). Listening to children and becoming. New York: Routhledge.
MacNaughton, G. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies: Applying poststructural ideas. London: Routledge. Todd, S. (2010). Pedagogy as transformative event: Becoming singularly present in context. Retrieved from: http://moodle.capilanou.ca/pluginfile.php?file= %2F524324%2Fmod_resource%2Fcontent%2F1%2FTodd%20on%20transformation.pdf
Zhao, G. (2012). Levinas and the mission of education. Educational Theory, 62(6), 659- 675.